Call to help strengthen worldwide nuclear security by stopping plutonium separation

Please sign this open letter to Prime Minister Abe on Japan’s reprocessing policy.

Release: March 25 (in time for the Nuclear Security Summit: March 31-April 1)
Signature deadline: March 22
Reply address for signing:Caitlin Stronell/Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center
contact@cnic.jp

Will you please sign/help circulate the letter and its cover letter, which is also pasted below?

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Best,
Masa
March 4, 2016
Cover Letter:
Dear Friends,
Greetings from Japan!
Japan is planning to start the operation of the Rokkasho nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in 2018 to separate as much as 8,000 kilograms of plutonium per year while it has already accumulated about 48,000 kilograms, equivalent to 6,000 weapons using the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) formula of 8 kg per bomb.
 
Moreover, the Japanese government has introduced a bill to the national Diet which will, in effect, permanently commit Japan to reprocessing its spent nuclear fuel. The stated purpose of the bill is to make sure that spent nuclear fuel would be reprocessed even if nuclear utilities went bankrupt in a competitive environment after the deregulation of the retail electricity market starting in April. The new law would make the nuclear utilities pay into a new government controlled entity responsible for reprocessing at the time of generation of spent nuclear fuel so that plutonium would be separated even if there were no reactors to consume the product. The law would make starting the Rokkasho reprocessing plant and building a second reprocessing plant mandatory.
 
Please see the attached open letter, addressed to the Prime Minister of Japan, “Call to help strengthen worldwide nuclear security by stopping plutonium separation.” We would like to release this letter, signed by leaders of organizations and prominent people around the world, on March 25, 2016, in time for the Nuclear Security Summit to be held in Washington DC on March 31-April 1.
 
If you can sign the letter, please send your name and title/affiliation, by March 22 to:
Caitlin Stronell/Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center
 
Please feel free to forward this to other groups.
 
Sincerely yours,
Hideyuki Ban, Co-Director, Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center
Yasunari Fujimoto, Secretary General, Japan Congress Against A- and H-Bombs (GENSUIKIN)
Akira Kawasaki, Executive Committee, Peace Boat
Kazuhiko Tamaki, President, Peace Depot
Letter to Abe:

To: Mr. Shinzo Abe

    Prime Minister of Japan

March 25, 2016

Subject: Call to help strengthen worldwide nuclear security by stopping plutonium separation

We, the undersigned, call on Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and the Government of Japan to make a strong contribution to the Nuclear Security Summit by announcing the indefinite postponement of the operation of the Rokkasho spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plant.

At the third Nuclear Security Summit held in The Hague, the Netherlands, in 2014 Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Barak Obama announced their agreement to:

“remove and dispose of all highly-enriched uranium (HEU) and separated plutonium from the Fast Critical Assembly (FCA) at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) in Japan.”

They declared that:

“this effort involves the elimination of hundreds of kilograms of nuclear material, furthering our mutual goal of minimizing stocks of HEU and separated plutonium worldwide, which will help prevent unauthorized actors, criminals, or terrorists from acquiring such materials.”

331 kilograms of plutonium from FCA are to be brought to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savanna River Site in South Carolina. According to the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), which operates the FCA, most of the plutonium (236 kg) is originally from the United Kingdom with 93 kg from the U.S. and the rest (2 kg) from France.

While asking the people of South Carolina to accept this material to protect the world from the possibility of theft from the JAEA’s lightly guarded Tokai-mura site, Japan is planning to begin to operate in 2018 its equally insecure Rokkasho Reprocessing plant, which is designed to separate annually up to 8,000 kilograms of plutonium from Japan’s spent nuclear fuel. The plant is currently the only reprocessing plant in a country that does not already possess nuclear weapons.

According to the US National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) Global Threat Reduction Initiative “Removal Program Overview” (December 3, 2014) the 331 kg of plutonium at FCA satisfies the program’s requirements for material to be sent to the United States for disposition, that:

“it must also pose a threat to national security, be susceptible to use in an improvised nuclear device, present a high risk of terrorist threat and have no other reasonable pathway to assure security from theft or diversion.”

While NNSA has been working hard to reduce this danger, it says threats still remain and calls for attention to the world-wide civilian separated plutonium problem emphasizing that:

“Global civilian plutonium inventories have risen sharply over the last 20 years” and that “Further international engagement is needed to stop plutonium accumulation and start drawing down inventories.”

After the 61st Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs, “Nagasaki’s Voice: Remember Your Humanity” (1-5 November 2015, Nagasaki, Japan) the Pugwash Council, sharing the same concern, declared:

“Reprocessing to separate plutonium should end in all countries, including all nuclear weapon countries, whether for energy or weapon purposes…In view of the international security consequences of fuel cycle decisions, countries need to mutually agree to restrictions on their national sovereignty in making nuclear fuel cycle decisions.”

As of the end of 2014 Japan had 47,800 kilograms of separated plutonium: 10,800 kg in Japan, 20,700 kg in UK, and 16,300 kg in France. According to the International Panel on Fissile Material (IPFM) the amount of civilian separated plutonium worldwide as of the end of 2014 is about 270,000 kg. Three nuclear weapons states, France, the U.K., and Russia, and Japan account for most of this separated plutonium. The United States is faced with a difficulty trying to dispose of about 50,000 kg of surplus weapons plutonium. Further accumulation of nuclear-weapon-usable material is a concern for the international society and for Japan’s neighbors, who wonder why Japan is separating such huge quantities of directly weapon-useable material. Separated plutonium is a security risk. If other countries followed Japan’s example, it would increase proliferation risks. In fact, South Korea has been demanding that the United States acknowledge that the ROK has the same right as Japan to separate plutonium.

When Prime Minister Abe and President Obama announced the plan to transfer 331kg of plutonium to the U.S., they went on to:

“encourage others to consider what they can do to further HEU and plutonium minimization.”

At that time, in March 2014, operations at the Rokkasho reprocessing plant were to begin just around the time of the coming Nuclear Security Summit. This would have been a very ironic timing. The date subsequently was postponed to 2018, due to the inability of the plant’s operator to satisfy the new safety rules set by the Nuclear Regulation Authority created after the Fukushima accident. Some might be secretly hoping that this might effectively lower the profile of Japan’s plutonium separation program at a time when Japan’s Government hopes that the U.S. will agree to automatically extend, in 2018, their Agreement of Cooperation on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, which includes the U.S. acceptance of Japan’s right to separate plutonium from spent fuel irradiated in U.S. designed nuclear power plants.

We call on Japan to announce, at the Nuclear Security Summit to be held in Washington DC. March 31-April 1 2016, an indefinite postponement of its plan to start the Rokkasho reprocessing plant in order to further the mutual goal of Japan and the U.S. to minimize global stocks of separated plutonium. That would be a great contribution to the worldwide effort to strengthen nuclear security.

 

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.